The National Secretariats and the coordination unit of the structures and Pam and Panorama delegates at the meeting on 23 September. Bologna discussed the status of ongoing litigation by certain one-sided termination of the CIA and the subsequent failure to apply existing rights: non payment of wages and variable elimination of permits for trade union activities of RSA / RSU.
Reaffirming the illegality of the business choices that are and will remain a serious offense is for infringement of the rights of workers and the willingness to marginalize the work of union and employee representatives, was also expressed doubts and concerns about the choice you want to proceed - in this very delicate phase of litigation - a merger Panorama of the company in even more spam
instrumental is the attitude of the hypermarkets in the Panorama: NON making the first of the supplementary contract while your Company began the negotiations for its renewal and then for trying to determine the rupture negotiation itself.
A rigid stance and unwarranted because:
You can not accuse the union of not being proactive, not to understand the needs of the company (!) And then manage the negotiating table with proposals that are found not to be mediated, not the subject of debate, in fact distort the negotiations.
Negotiations for the renewal can be summarized in a few basic steps:
• Panorama has rejected almost entirely the result of the demands made on the platform of consultation and discussion of female and male workers. Some of these claims because they were shared, others because the company says, were not matters relevant to that level of debate (!!).
• Panorama has placed the parties on union demands: the elimination of fixed premium for young recruits, the revisiting of the wage variable with a change of parameters in order to deliver the premium only if the company produces and improves its profit share from the previous year exceeding 3% and providing, in case of failure to reach that percentage, an additional barrier that precludes the chance to compete for the result of the store.
• The solution to these two problems were considered by the conditions essential to think of the supplementary contract.
The trade union response and coordination has been refusing to set a time for business to lay the foundations of inequality among workers (the fixed salary) and above all time not to recognize any material economic mechanism to reward and incentive workers and employees of Panorama.
The union was not limited only to motivate the opposition but also has developed an alternative hypothesis coordination with the time to search for a possible ground of understanding with the company: •
we have proposed a mechanism for a fixed wage for workers new employees that changes the way of achievement and delivery while also providing a further extension in time.
• For variable pay has been proposed a model where, taking into account the situation of crisis and the sector, the premium clicks to reach a sufficient annual profit, that is, the prize will be awarded in proportion to 'useful reached. If they can not profit at the national level sufficient to trigger the reward you can combine with the same mechanism, a useful point of sale.
• We have also stressed, due to the campaign implemented by the importance of product quality and customer service to provide the parameters of the variable premium also the quality.
NOTHING DONE! Not being able to move the usual indictment of the inability on the part of the coordination and trade unions to draw up proposals, the company has ruled that their claims on fixed salary and variable pay is not be mediated: TAKE OR LEAVE!
PANORAMA therefore sanctioned the breaking of the treaty showed an even more dangerous is that it does not recognize any value to the bargaining, to find common solutions with workers.
PANORAMA has established its line of made unilateral decisions, reducing economic and regulatory conditions of workers and employees.
The National Secretariats FILCAMS FISASCAT-of-UILTuCS and the Coordination Unit of the stress PANORAMA: •
will, as already demonstrated, to find mediation to reach a balanced agreement
• provide additional value to the contract as an instrument of governance and participation workers in the life of the
Reaffirming the illegality of the business choices that are and will remain a serious offense is for infringement of the rights of workers and the willingness to marginalize the work of union and employee representatives, was also expressed doubts and concerns about the choice you want to proceed - in this very delicate phase of litigation - a merger Panorama of the company in even more spam
instrumental is the attitude of the hypermarkets in the Panorama: NON making the first of the supplementary contract while your Company began the negotiations for its renewal and then for trying to determine the rupture negotiation itself.
A rigid stance and unwarranted because:
You can not accuse the union of not being proactive, not to understand the needs of the company (!) And then manage the negotiating table with proposals that are found not to be mediated, not the subject of debate, in fact distort the negotiations.
Negotiations for the renewal can be summarized in a few basic steps:
• Panorama has rejected almost entirely the result of the demands made on the platform of consultation and discussion of female and male workers. Some of these claims because they were shared, others because the company says, were not matters relevant to that level of debate (!!).
• Panorama has placed the parties on union demands: the elimination of fixed premium for young recruits, the revisiting of the wage variable with a change of parameters in order to deliver the premium only if the company produces and improves its profit share from the previous year exceeding 3% and providing, in case of failure to reach that percentage, an additional barrier that precludes the chance to compete for the result of the store.
• The solution to these two problems were considered by the conditions essential to think of the supplementary contract.
The trade union response and coordination has been refusing to set a time for business to lay the foundations of inequality among workers (the fixed salary) and above all time not to recognize any material economic mechanism to reward and incentive workers and employees of Panorama.
The union was not limited only to motivate the opposition but also has developed an alternative hypothesis coordination with the time to search for a possible ground of understanding with the company: •
we have proposed a mechanism for a fixed wage for workers new employees that changes the way of achievement and delivery while also providing a further extension in time.
• For variable pay has been proposed a model where, taking into account the situation of crisis and the sector, the premium clicks to reach a sufficient annual profit, that is, the prize will be awarded in proportion to 'useful reached. If they can not profit at the national level sufficient to trigger the reward you can combine with the same mechanism, a useful point of sale.
• We have also stressed, due to the campaign implemented by the importance of product quality and customer service to provide the parameters of the variable premium also the quality.
NOTHING DONE! Not being able to move the usual indictment of the inability on the part of the coordination and trade unions to draw up proposals, the company has ruled that their claims on fixed salary and variable pay is not be mediated: TAKE OR LEAVE!
PANORAMA therefore sanctioned the breaking of the treaty showed an even more dangerous is that it does not recognize any value to the bargaining, to find common solutions with workers.
PANORAMA has established its line of made unilateral decisions, reducing economic and regulatory conditions of workers and employees.
The National Secretariats FILCAMS FISASCAT-of-UILTuCS and the Coordination Unit of the stress PANORAMA: •
will, as already demonstrated, to find mediation to reach a balanced agreement
• provide additional value to the contract as an instrument of governance and participation workers in the life of the
CONSIDER UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOUR overview of whom you ask
to Reopen the
TABLE POSITION WITH MORE 'BALANCED TO TAKE ON A COURSE OF DEALING
without vetoes
IN SUPPORT of this objective, the National Secretariat
FILCAMS- FISASCAT-UILTuCS
CONFIRM THE STATE OF SHAKING
and
PROCLAIMED 8 HOURS STRIKES
be made by November 2 to November 21, 2010
(the management and the joint is left to the local structures) and
An information campaign with offices
in the streets and in stores PANORAMA
to Reopen the
TABLE POSITION WITH MORE 'BALANCED TO TAKE ON A COURSE OF DEALING
without vetoes
IN SUPPORT of this objective, the National Secretariat
FILCAMS- FISASCAT-UILTuCS
CONFIRM THE STATE OF SHAKING
and
PROCLAIMED 8 HOURS STRIKES
be made by November 2 to November 21, 2010
(the management and the joint is left to the local structures) and
An information campaign with offices
in the streets and in stores PANORAMA
( Feat CCU)
0 comments:
Post a Comment